Middle ground --- I wonder if there's space between enemy and partner that is worth considering. For example, some theorists talk of agonistic relationships where material and fundamental differences are acknowledged, but where each side recognises the others' genuine legitimacy in the space of negotiation. Though perhaps that is what you mean by 'partner'... Chantal Mouffe's description, in contrast, invokes the opponent rather then the enemy.

Source author: Murdoch Stephens murdoch.stephens@redcross.org.nz