balancing human rights and security --- As in any other aspect of human existence where the common good takes precedence over selfish motives/intent, there must be compromises for the betterment of society and the common good. However, there should be globally accepted Red Lines which should not be breached and if so, whether security or human rights (depending on the circumstance) should be impinged upon for the common welfare. For example, CSAM should be a red line and if violated - it does not matter if one's 'private/personal data' is needed to solve the crime, then the data should be used. similarly, should there be a human right issue nad some security aspect is required, that too should be allowed; these should be handled on a case by case basis with the overriding principle being the common good of society.

Source author: Bennette Thomas thomasb@dominica.gov.dm