Temporality of vulnerability --- It is interesting to see that some of the following descriptions or explanations of vulnerability do not seem to be so temporary - as one's identity is not situational, nor temporary. However, whether for example one's identity might cause vulnerability does indeed vary depending on the context, although it could cause for a long period of time.

How or based on which criteria does a HDiplomat determine who is ‘most’ vulnerable and needs to be advocated for? And how does for example the probability of achieving an actual difference for the people in need is taken into account?

Source author: Eefje Appel eappel@redcross.nl