strengtheningoversight mechanisms for the use of data-driven technology, including artificial intelligence, to support the maintenance of international peace and security

significant model public releases within scope

introduced after the watermarking system is developed

Companies commit to advancing this area of research, and to developing a multi-faceted, specialized, and detailed red-teaming regime, including drawing on independent domain experts, for all major public releases of new models within scope

Where commitments mention particular models, they apply only to generative models that are overall more powerful than the current industry frontier (

only a first step in developing and enforcing binding obligations to ensure safety, security, and trus

access to its safe technology could be offered as an incentivefor countries to participate in a governance regime that enforces responsibility (such as agreementsto enact stricter regulation, or restrict military AI development).

uture regulations will limit access to powerful AI technologies in jurisdictions with inadequate AIgovernanc

o increase chances of success, aCommission should foreground scientific rigor and the selection of highly competent AI expertswho work at the cutting edge of technological development and who can continually interpret theever-changing technological and risk landscape

there is significant disagreement even among experts about the different opportunities andchallenges created by advanced AI

International consensus on the opportunities and risks from advanced AI

the Commission on Frontier AI could facilitatescientific consensus by convening experts to conduct rigorous and comprehensive assessments ofkey AI topics, such as interventions to unlock AI’s potential for sustainable development, the effectsof AI regulation on innovation, the distribution of benefits, and possible dual-use capabilities fromadvanced systems and how they ought to be managed

dangerous inputs: computing resources have been targeted by US, Japanese and Dutch export controlsthat prevent the sale of certain AI chips and semiconductor manufacturing equipment to Chin

standards

Establish guidelines

develop frontier AI collectively or distribute and enable access

developing and/or enabling safe forms of access to AI.

ontrolling AIinputs

three principles, transparency, accountability, and limits on use.

Number one, you’re here because AI is this extraordinary new technology that everyone says can be transformative as much as the printing press. Number two is really unknown what’s gonna happen. But there’s a big fear you’ve expressed to all of you about what bad actors can do and will do if there’s no rules of the road. Number three, as a member who served in the house and now in the Senate, I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s impossible for Congress to keep up with the speed of technology.

the central scientific issue

the conception of the EU AI Act is very consistent with this concept of precision regulation where you’re regulating the use of the technology in context.

a reasonable care standard.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman and Senator Hawley for having this. I’m trying to find out how it is different than social media and learn from the mistakes we made with social media. The idea of not suing social media companies is to allow the internet to flourish. Because if I slander you you can sue me. If you’re a billboard company and you put up the slander, can you sue the billboard company? We said no. Basically, section 230 is being used by social media companies to high, to avoid liability for activity that other people generate. When they refuse to comply with their terms of use, a mother calls up the company and says, this app is being used to bully my child to death. You promise, in the terms of use, she would prevent bullying. And she calls three times, she gets no response, the child kills herself and they can’t sue. Do you all agree we don’t wanna do that again?

the current version of GPT-4 ended to training in 2021.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN):

that people own their virtual you.

When you think about the energy costs alone, just for training these systems, it would not be a good model if every country has its own policies and each, for each jurisdiction, every company has to train another model.

need a cabinet level organization within the United States in order to address this.

If these large language models can, even now, based on the information we put into them quite accurately predict public opinion, you know, ahead of time. I mean, predict, it’s before you even ask the public these questions, what will happen when entities, whether it’s corporate entities or whether it’s governmental entities, or whether it’s campaigns or whether it’s foreign actors, take this survey information, these predictions about public opinion and then fine tune strategies to elicit certain responses, certain behavioral responses.

large language models can indeed predict public opinion.

So I think the most important thing that we could be doing and can, and should be doing now, is to prepare the workforce of today and the workforce of tomorrow for partnering with AI technologies and using them. And we’ve been very involved for, for years now in doing that in focusing on skills-based hiring in educating for the skills of the future. Our skills build platform has 7 million learners and over a thousand courses worldwide focused on skills. And we’ve pledged to train 30 million individuals by 2030 in the skills that are needed for society today.

The National Institutes of Standards and technology actually already has an AI accuracy test,

Ultimately, we may need something like cern Global, international and neutral, but focused on AI safety rather than high energy physics.

But we also need independent scientists, not just so that we scientists can have a voice, but so that we can participate directly in addressing the problems in evaluating solutions.

46