“You don’t own ‘web3’. VCs and their [limited partners] do,”

Pitted against them are the sceptics.

On one side sit techno-Utopians, firms offering assorted web3 services and their VC backers.

His token showed that NFTs are not as non-fungible as advertised. And OpenSea’s reaction illustrated that the supposedly decentralised web3 has its own gatekeepers.

NFTs are the most visible instantiation of “web3”—an idea that its advocates and their venture-capital (VC) backers hail as a better, more decentralised version of the internet, built atop distributed ledgers known as blockchains.

NFTs are the most visible instantiation of “web3”—an idea that its advocates and their venture-capital (VC) backers hail as a better, more decentralised version of the internet,

The remedy for the failures of competition policy is not to abandon the consumer welfare standard but to bring it up to date.

The large and fluid tech ecosystems offered by Alphabet, Amazon, Apple and others show the complexity of the task: they are in an innovative phase with new services being created that are highly popular and they increasingly compete with each other. It would be easy to erode the quality of their products with ill-judged rules.

Regulators and governments, especially in Europe, must be realistic about their ability to anticipate consumers’ needs and should not pursue firms purely because they have grown big by being useful

Before the consumer welfare standard emerged in legal judgments in the 1970s and 1980s, America’s trustbusting was capricious.

a bill that would ban tech giants from using their platforms to favour their own services.

Since the 1990s the EU has tended to put consumers’ interests first, but now its commissioner wants to apply a “broader notion” of harm.

One school, named after Louis Brandeis, a judge, holds that big companies must be tamed because they corrupt politics and damage customers, competitors and staff. The other says the goal of antitrust is to protect the welfare of consumers, which can be enhanced by big, efficient firms. For decades the consumer approach has been ascendant, but now the consensus has frayed and trustbusters are heading in a Brandeisian direction.

Interoperability often requires a level of commercial and technical finesse rarely seen in the management of government contracts.

In 2017 thousands of Google employees signed a letter outlining their unhappiness with the company’s role in the Maven project. Microsoft’s bid for the JEDI contract faced internal opposition on similar grounds. Many others will also have concerns about data fusion on such a scale, for military or any other purposes.

to build “a continuous pipeline of all-source intelligence analysis” into “continually learning analytic engines”.

“data fusion”—combining different pieces of information to reveal things that one source cannot capture, including things no human would think to look for.

In 2019 the Pentagon awarded Microsoft a $10bn contract for its Joint Enterprise Defence Infrastructure (JEDI). Last year Amazon, which has been supplying the CIA with such services since 2013, got the contract annulled. A new tender issued in November will probably see the work shared among a number of firms. There will be more than enough to go around.

an increasing amount of processing be done “on the edge”—that is, on the platform carrying the sensor.

an narrow down a huge range of potential targets and pass information about them freely to where it is most needed.

But radar’s capabilities had to be built into systems that made use of them.

you need ways to combine their data into information that can be acted on at speed.

We labelled each of the roughly 1,700 songs with the lyrics language using an automated technique.

Many of the K-pop bands popular in South Korea manage to achieve global success by mixing in some English.

we plotted the most-streamed song for countries in each group weekly for the full five-year period, revealing precisely when and where these leaps happen.

the hegemony of English is in decline.

The Economist trawled through the top 100 tracks in 70 countries according to Spotify.

that price will be paid from the wallet rather than through physical suffering.

the amount of gas held in storage.

he thinks extra LNG could fill 15% of the shortfall that would result from a complete Russian cut-off.

to retire coal-fired power stations and its rash decision, taken in the wake of Japan’s Fukushima disaster, to shut down its nuclear plants, it remains more reliant on natural gas than it need be.

Germany is the most vulnerable.

This would be felt most acutely in Slovakia, Austria and parts of Italy (see chart), reckons David Victor of the University of California, San Diego

Without a war, JPMorgan Chase, a bank, forecasts that higher prices will lead to Gazprom making over $90bn in gross operating profit this year, up from $20bn in 2019.

may yet agree on how to contain China’s semiconductor ambitions. But it may prove impossible for one state to control such a complex industry.

despite Mr Trump’s campaign to snuff out China’s indigenous industries and Mr Biden’s more multilateral attempts to achieve the same end.

American semiconductor companies and those in friendly countries could sell their most advanced chipmaking services to the Chinese market, yet still be able to prevent Chinese firms from developing the most sophisticated manufacturing capacity themselves.

should focus on protecting trade secrets.

controlling exports of specific machines and components is unwise anyway, because no net of controls can be drawn tightly enough to stop a determined,

a compromise by cutting off Chinese access to chips and chipmaking tools above a certain level of sophistication.

America is caught between choosing a softer set of controls which may work better in the long run, or a harsher set that could hurt Chinese technology more in the short run but might harm American industry overall.

Without America’s friends on board America’s hard line on exports threatens to weaken its own companies.

The Europeans and the Japanese both want a more formal multilateral approach. But America reckons its ability to react fast to a Chinese threat would inevitably be curbed.

narrower coalition-of-the-willing approach to diplomacy.

the leading countries in the chip supply chain—America, Japan and the Netherlands

the Semiconductor Industry Association

of meetings to discuss sanctions that might be put on Russia

the Quad, a club of countries that embraces America, Australia, India and Japan.

global chip diplomacy is still weak.

to co-operate in “rebalancing” global chip supply chains. That was diplomatic language for keeping them away from China.

he EU-US Trade and Technology Council,

Officials pay lip service to the idea of updating Wassenaar so that it might help control the trade in semiconductors.

the Organisation of the Semiconductor Exporting Countries: OSEC.

he has never seen semiconductors so consistently top the diplomatic agenda.

must build a consensus with friendly countries.

lose its grip over the chip supply chain.

to develop their own versions of chip technologies they had previously imported along supply chains linked to firms in America.

beyond the reach of American law.

to evade America’s Export Administration Regulations, qualifying them as “ EAR-free”

Last year Huawei’s revenues shrank for the first time in a decade, by almost a third.

Digitalization is the use of digital technologies to change a business model and provide new revenue and value-producing opportunities; it is the process of moving to a digital business.

“Fundamentally, this resulted in a breakdown of trust between the business and the data sides of the house. That inspired us to leave Flexport and really try to understand its problem and solve it.”

with heritage in design of fault-tolerant systems.

with no dependence on external technology or licenses,

To some extent, RISC-V is at hardware (HW) level what Linux was in its origins at Operating System level, offering a competitive open source platform able to compete with Windows-based products.

requires improved computing performance, and methods to ensure safe and reliable software (SW) execution

open standard, it is designed to be adopted by any software, device, or online platform as well as by regulatory bodies and government agencies to establish standards for digital provenance

C2PA specification will provide platforms with a method to define what information is associated with each type of asset (e.g., images, videos, audio, or documents), how that information is presented and stored, and how evidence of tampering can be identified

establishing the provenance of media is critical to ensure transparency, understanding, and trust

empowers content creators and editors worldwide to create tamper-evident media, by enabling them to selectively disclose information about who created or changed digital content and how it was altered

released version 1.0 of its technical specification for digital provenance

the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA)

concrete hope toward making these qubits compute

the MIT team’s new qubit appears to be extremely robust, able to maintain a superposition between two vibrational states, even in the midst of environmental noise, for up to 10 seconds.

many types of qubits, some of which are engineered and others that exist naturally

Where a classical bit in today’s computers carries out a series of logical operations starting from one of either two states, 0 or 1, a qubit can exist in a superposition of both states. While in this delicate in-between state, a qubit should be able to simultaneously communicate with many other qubits and process multiple streams of information at a time, to quickly solve problems that would take classical computers years to process.

such wobbly qubits could be a promising foundation for future quantum computers

when pairs of fermions are chilled and trapped in an optical lattice, the particles can exist simultaneously in two states — a weird quantum phenomenon known as superposition.

MIT physicists have discovered a new quantum bit, or “qubit,” in the form of vibrating pairs of atoms known as fermions.

PRINCIPLES FOR DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT

Design for scale:Widespread distribution of digital projects requires more than a pilot project, but also sustainable models and funding and partners who are also able to implement the initiatives in other regions.4) Build for sustainability: To achieve long-term impact, it is important to support users and stakeholders equally – with sustainable programmes, platforms and digital tools

Vožnja električnim automobilom skuplja nego "dizelašem"

Twist takes a big step towards making quantum programming easier by guaranteeing that the quantum bits in a pure piece of code cannot be altered by bits not in that cod

The scientists designed Twist to be expressive enough to write out programs for well-known quantum algorithms and identify bugs in their implementations.

understanding the meaning of a quantum program requires understanding the entanglement present in its data

Twist paves the way to languages that make the unique challenges of quantum computing more accessible to programmers

“Our language Twist allows a developer to write safer quantum programs by explicitly stating when a qubit must not be entangled with another,”

Twist can describe and verify which pieces of data are entangled in a quantum program, through a language a classical programmer can understand.

discarding one qubit without being mindful of its entanglement with another qubit can destroy the data stored in the other, jeopardizing the correctness of the program.

Twist is an MIT-developed programming language

By calling on NATO to pull military infrastructure out of Eastern Europe, and on the U.S. to offer written guarantees that it will never support Ukraine’s accession to NATO, Sarotte told me, “he wants a do-over of 1997.”

“Just as a glacier sweeps across a landscape slowly, yet alters broad swathes of terrain profoundly, so too did NATO’s expansion eastward force elements of the post-Cold War political landscape to shift and settle, leaving behind landmarks for the twenty-first century.”

At a summit in Helsinki, Clinton promised to give Yeltsin four billion dollars in investment in 1997, as much as the U.S. had provided in the five years prior, while also dangling W.T.O. membership and other economic inducements.

Washington “must be very careful not to be seen as running after the Russians, offering them concessions,” Clinton’s Secretary of State at the time, Warren Christopher, said.

Putin’s current demand—clearly provocative and unrealistic—is for NATO to remove its military infrastructure from states that joined after the 1997 agreement.

a Russia-NATO agreement signed by his predecessor Boris Yeltsin in May, 1997

(Moscow, short on cash and presiding over a collapsing empire, was in desperate need of the fifteen billion Deutsche marks that it received in order to withdraw Soviet forces from East Germany); Western confidence and ambition (“To hell with that,” Bush had told Kohl at Camp David, dismissing the Soviets’ efforts to dictate Germany’s future relationship with NATO. “We prevailed and they didn’t”); and bungling negotiating on the part of Gorbachev (“This carelessness will take its revenge on us,” Valentin Falin, a top Soviet official and expert on Germany, remarked).

In September, 1990, Gorbachev signed off on the Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany

as a sign that the secretary had only been test-driving one potential option of many.”

Soviet leaders would rather see Germany anchored in a multilateral alliance than left on its own.

the West should lock in as many gains as it could before the political climate shifted yet again and Moscow’s position became more entrenched

“An extension of NATO’s territory to the east, that is, nearer to the borders of the Soviet Union, will not happen,” he said in one address, as Sarotte recounts.

the context of the moment

the truth looks to be somewhere in between.”

Did the West, led by the U.S., promise to limit NATO expansion eastward?

The phrase “not one inch” is a reference to a statement made by U.S. Secretary of State James Baker, in 1990

“ ‘Not one inch to the East,’ they told us in the nineties. So what? They cheated, just brazenly tricked us!”

have different interpretations of history

Why Washington Can’t Learn

Only if Americans abandon their fealty to the idea of American Exceptionalism and the militarism that has sustained it, might it be possible to conclude that the wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan served some faintly useful purpose.

Almost certainly, the North Vietnamese would have succeeded in uniting their divided country with much less bloodshed. And Taliban control of Afghanistan would in all likelihood have continued without interruption in the years following 2001, with the Afghan people left to sort out their own destiny. Yet, despite immense sacrifices by U.S. troops, a vast expenditure of treasure, and quite literally millions of dead in Southeast Asia and Afghanistan, that’s exactly how things turned out anyway.

too few Americans are willing to confront the disaster that has befallen the United States as a consequence of our serial misuse of military power.

Reliance on conscription to raise the force that fought in Vietnam spurred widespread popular opposition to that war. Reliance on a so-called volunteer military to carry the burden of waging the Afghan War allowed ordinary Americans to ignore what was being done in their name, especially when field commanders devised methods for keeping a lid on U.S. casualties.

It’s time to substitute a narrative describing an American military enterprise that began when the first U.S. combat troops came ashore in South Vietnam and persisted until the last American soldier departed Kabul in defeat some 56 years later.

Subsuming them, however, was the concept of American exceptionalism.

While these events unleashed a torrent of self-congratulation in the U.S., the passing of the Cold War did not substantively modify the aspirations or expectations of the American people. For decades, the United States had exerted itself to uphold and enhance the advantageous position it gained in 1945. Its tacit goal was not only to hold the communist world in check but to achieve ideological, economic, political, and military primacy on a global scale, with all but the most cynical American leaders genuinely persuaded that U.S. supremacy served the interests of humankind.

Among the things it left fully intact was a stubborn resistance to learning in Washington that poses a greater threat to the wellbeing of the American people than communism or terrorism ever did.

That war was destined to continue for 20 years. By the time it ended, many observers had long since begun to compare it to Vietnam. The similarities were impossible to miss. Both were wars of doubtful strategic necessity. Both dragged on endlessly. Both concluded in mortifying failure. To capture the essence of the war in Afghanistan, it didn’t take long for critics to revive a term that had been widely used to describe Vietnam: each was a quagmire. Here was all you needed to know.

The Global War on Terror now became the organizing principle for American statecraft, serving a function comparable to the Cold War during the second half of the prior century.

When President Richard Nixon visited “Red” China in 1972, the Cold War morphed into something quite different. With the nation’s most prominent anticommunist taking obvious delight in shaking hands with Chairman Mao Zedong in Beijing, the war effort in Vietnam became utterly inexplicable — and so it has remained ever since.

In history, context is everything.

"Entanglement forging essentially enables you to cut up a larger circuit into smaller circuits that we can execute on smaller hardware

Entanglement forging could markedly expand the computational power of quantum systems

Entanglement forging, it turns out, involves the use of a classical computer to capture quantum correlations and effectively split the problem in half, making it possible to separate the 10 spin-orbitals of the into two groups of five that could be processed separately. This doubles the size of the system that can be simulated on quantum hardware.

would speed technological innovation

bring even more vendors into the wireless industry, by allowing companies to hyperspecialize.

In its most ambitious version, Open RAN would split the RAN into smaller components beyond the radio and the baseband unit.

“Ericsson is probably in the party that's fighting back the most against Open RAN, because they will probably have the most to lose."

disaggregation

The surest way to avoid such a disaster is to stick with the same vendor from one end of the network to the other, thus avoiding any possibility of mismatched interfaces.

companies that can provide cutting-edge end-to-end networks. It's now just three: Ericsson, Nokia, and Huawei.

the tweaks primarily take the form of vendors defining radio parameters that were intentionally left blank in 3GPP standards for future development.

there is nothing preventing a vendor from “complementing" a standardized interface with additional proprietary techniques.

Unfortunately, the long and short of it is usually: the more qubits you have the more errors you get. The new research hopes to alleviate that by creating a new way to handle qubit operations, thus allowing gate-based quantum computer systems to scale.

each team was able to build a distinct, silicon-based, two-qubit quantum computing system capable of operating with greater than 99% accuracy

e are not seeing to splinter the internet

defected

defectio

incorporating diverse stakeholder views

While the initial call to action and the ultimate Alliance would consist of governments, ultimately the Alliance would also include a substantial multi-stakeholder component,

exceptions such as blocking illegal content and/or specified national security exemption

pen and interoperable access for software and apps

nondiscrimination among Alliance members in domestic regulation in the internet secto

a commitment to use only trustworthy providers for core information and communications technologies network infrastructure.

echnical and non-technical security standards

a plan to develop a charter of operational principles and commitments over the course of 2022 and 202

his year, Chinese researchers have produced more AI-related papers than any other nation, with the country having 27.68% of the global share of research papers in the field of AI and becoming the global lead in our Research in AI papers indicator, boosting its score in the Human Capital dimension.

Indonesia and Vietnam have both released na-tional AI strategies in the time since our 2020 index was compiled

This reflects the country’s Vision dimension score (it has a National AI Strategy), its commitment to addressing ethics in AI as shown in its Artificial Intelligence Governance Framework,

he country recently published its National AI Strategy with strategic priorities for the period 2021-2025.

In 2020, the Ethiopian Council of Min-isters established an artificial intelligence (AI) re-search and development centre.

Kenya has de-veloped an AI taskforce (consisting of 11 experts from relevant government agencies, the private sector, academia and other stakeholders)

Mauritius has developed an official National AI Strategy, which sets out a plan from 2018-2022 to guide progress in this area. Although South Africa is yet to launch a national AI strategy, it has established a Presidential Commission on Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Qatar and Saudi Arabia unveiled their National AI Strat-egies. Qatar’s National Artificial Intelligence Strat-egy focuses on six main pillars: education, data access, employment, business, research, and ethics. Additionally, the strategy aligns with the overarching Qatar National Vision 2030, which identifies artificial intelligence as a central compo-nent in the country’s transition from an oil-based economy to a knowledge-based economy. Simi-larly, Saudi Arabia released its National Data and Artificial Intelligence Strategy, with six goals

the largest range of scores

Ukraine, in fact, released its national AI strategy in Decem-ber 2021,

four new national AI strategies in Eastern Europe: Bulgaria, Slovenia, Hungary, Latvia.

he number of AI and non-AI technology unicorns rise from 43 to 62 in the region

those countries in Western Europe who are not developing national AI strategies (Iceland and Switzerland) are not EU member states.

Italy has taken a similar approach with its three-year Strategic Program for Artificial Intel-ligence, released in November 2021,

the Caribbean Artificial Intelligence Initiative led by UNESCO, which seeks to create a sub-regional strategy on the responsible, inclusive and human adoption of AI in the Caribbean

In 2020, the Colombian government launched the National Policy for Digital Transformation (AI Strategy) and recently created an AI Task Force comprising government officials and sub-ject matter experts.

the fAIr initiative led by the

the launch of national AI frameworks by the governments of Chile and Brazil has been one of the main events in the subcontinent

The top four countries in the region (in order, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Uruguay

Latin America and the Caribbean had a region-al average score of 41.26 — the third lowest globally after the Middle East & North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa.

China tops the Number of research papers published in AI, and the country outperformed the USA for the first time in 2020 in terms of the number of times an academic article on AI is cited by others.

Sub-Sa-haran Africa and Central & South Asia

evident divide within re-gions, with the greatest range of scores seen in East Asia and Middle East and North Africa

The index unearths clear inter-regional and in-tra-regional inequalities.

East Asian countries make up one quarter of the top 20 ranked coun-tries.

USA tops the global rankings, in large part thanks to the unrivalled size and maturity of its technology sector. Singapore ranks sec-ond as a result of its institutional strength and government digital capacity. The other countries in the top 5 are Western European (United King-dom, Finland, and the Netherlands)

The senior administration official said basic human rights and freedoms have been “core to any affirmative vision of the internet” from the beginning.

encourage any splintering of the internet”

Asking governments around the world to root out any internet infrastructure made by Chinese companies like Huawei as a barrier to entry into the alliance struck Pielemeier,

including a pledge “to use only trustworthy providers” in core internet infrastructure — a stipulation that freaked out some digital rights advocates and called to mind the “clean network” initiative that began under the Trump administration.

In the future, 3GPP and O-RAN are going to co-exist and share a number of key technological features, at the same time that they complement and compete with each other. Operators have and should continue to have the freedom to choose, and suppliers should need no permission from policy makers to make their choices and place their bets.   Therefore, market-based competition ­– where merits of technical performance and the competitiveness of different solutions and architectures decide market outcomes – should be ensured. The freedom of the market should prevail and not be taken away from commercial players’ ability to make their investment choices. This means that different approaches can compete on technical merits, price, security, flexibility and functionality.  Presence of market forces, innovation and open interfaces are meant to ensure that competition prevails and delivers end-user and societal benefits.   Therefore, policy makers should not pick winners, but continue to ensure the following outcomes:  Open markets for competition while letting the market decide   Technology-neutral regulation, not mandating any architecture  Technology-neutral fixed broadband and wireless roll-out subsidies, which only target geographies where commercial, market-driven investments are not a viable option to ensure digital inclusion. 

Amarna Letters

Writing as the key ancient diplomatic ‘technology’

The United States

Maybe we make our decisions on the basis of vastly complex processes that bear very little resemblance to the explanations we give for our decisions. Maybe all or nearly all explanations are just post-hoc rationalisations.

translate them into reasoning a human can understand.

giving the student an approximate rule and advising them that there are exceptions.

experiencing a poem means experiencing something too complicated to be explained systematically. I see this as having kinship with the conceptual richness problem, although it’s not quite the same thing.

Poetry criticism:

Partly the answer is a judgment call- I think that the statistics I gave were, broadly speaking, very fair.

But that question contains a series of thick concepts- e.g “unusually bad period”, “economically speaking” “American working class”.

“has the American working class had an unusually bad period, economically speaking, in the last 55+ years”.

I would object to this objection that it was fairer on the whole just to look at the aggregate if we are to assess the position of the working class qua working class.

The right often maintains that the law here is clear, and it is not the job of judges to legislate from the bench- even where the law will lead to tragedy as in this case.

no Schelling point of literalism

everyone in the room is interpreting the law in terms of policy goals and ethical values to some degree.

So does this case break down into a Sophie’s choice between going with the law and going with morality?